Print

Federal judge blocks Trump’s executive order ending birthright citizenship, labels it ‘unconstitutional’

A federal judge in Seattle has issued a temporary restraining order halting former President Donald Trump’s controversial executive order to terminate birthright citizenship, deeming the policy “blatantly unconstitutional,” as reported by CNN.

Judge John Coughenour, appointed by former President Ronald Reagan, ruled in response to a lawsuit filed by Washington Attorney General Nick Brown and three other Democratic-led states. The restraining order, effective for 14 days, pauses the policy’s implementation to allow for additional legal arguments.

“I have been on the bench for over four decades. I can’t recall a case where the legal question was so unequivocal,” Judge Coughenour remarked, expressing shock over the executive order’s legitimacy. “Where were the lawyers?” he questioned, calling the order’s constitutionality mind-boggling.

The legal challenge contends that the executive order violates the 14th Amendment, which guarantees citizenship to all children born in the United States and “subject to the jurisdiction thereof.” Lane Polozola, an attorney representing Washington state, emphasized the immediate harm posed by the policy, stating, “Babies are being born today under a cloud of uncertainty about their citizenship.” He further warned that denying citizenship to these children could result in “long-term substantial negative impacts” and impose significant financial burdens on state programs.

The Trump administration, however, argues that the 14th Amendment’s jurisdiction clause allows the president to exclude children of undocumented immigrants and non-permanent residents. Justice Department attorney Brett Shumate urged the court to refrain from making a “snap judgment” on the matter, requesting additional time for briefing.

Despite the restraining order, Trump expressed his administration’s intent to challenge the ruling. The executive order has already faced multiple lawsuits, including cases brought by immigrant rights groups, Democratic attorneys general, and individual plaintiffs.

In a separate Maryland case, Justice Department attorney Brad Rosenberg admitted that federal agencies had not yet begun enforcing the order. “The executive order was issued three days ago during a time of transition between administrations,” Rosenberg explained, adding that agencies needed time to develop implementation policies.

Upcoming hearings are scheduled to address the policy’s legal challenges. In Maryland, a hearing on February 5 will consider a temporary block of the order, while a New Hampshire federal court will hear arguments on February 10 regarding a preliminary injunction sought by civil rights and immigration groups.

(Inputs from ANI)

RELATED ARTICLES

30/05/26 | 11:11 am | ceasefire with Iran

Trump says he will soon decide on Iran deal, demands reopening of Hormuz Strait

U.S. President Donald Trump said on Friday he would soon decide on a proposed deal to extend the ceasefire with Iran, though the two countries still appeared to differ on significant issues that have been central to the conflict. Trump said on Frida...

30/05/26 | 11:06 am | Goa

May Goa continue to prosper, play important role in building a Viksit Bharat: PM Modi on Statehood Day

Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Saturday extended greetings to the people of Goa on the occasion of Goa Statehood Day, highlighting the state’s cultural richness, natural beauty, and contribution to India’s growth. In a post on X, Prime Minister...

29/05/26 | 4:30 pm | injuring two

Romania says Russian drone hit apartment block, NATO vows to defend alliance territory

NATO accused Moscow on Friday of reckless behaviour and pledged to "defend every inch of Allied territory" after Romania said a Russian drone had crashed into an apartment block in the alliance member state during an attack on neighbouring Ukraine. ...